The Cost of Standing Still
A first look at how often APAC companies change between review cycles
We have been monitoring live registry data for 620 companies across seven APAC jurisdictions over two months. These are the first signals from that sample. Roughly 1 in 7 companies recorded a registry change, and the first appeared within two days. A larger study across 8,000 companies is now under way, and the full findings will follow when it is complete.
Preliminary data, 10 June to 10 August 2026. Directional only; final figures from the full study may differ.
620 Companies Under Watch
92 changedEach square is one monitored company. Highlighted squares recorded at least one registry change within two months.
Select a jurisdiction to see its share of the sample.
~1 in 7 Sampled Companies Recorded a Change Within Two Months
In the first two months of continuous monitoring, 92 of the 620 companies in our initial sample recorded at least one registry change, the first within two days. Many review cycles run on a 12 or 24 month calendar.
Many compliance programmes are still built around periodic reviews, yet this study shows that company information can change within days. Rather than relying solely on scheduled reviews, organisations increasingly need approaches that help them identify when relevant company information changes.
Change Rates Looked Very Different by Market
The early data points to wide variation between jurisdictions, both in how many companies changed and how quickly the first change surfaced. A higher observed rate describes this sample only. It is not a measure of jurisdiction risk.
Companies With at Least One Detected Change
Share of monitored companies, by jurisdiction
Australia is based on a 20-company cohort (all other jurisdictions n=100) and should be read with caution.
Time to First Detected Change
Days after monitoring started, by jurisdiction
First change recorded in each jurisdiction. The dotted line marks the sample average of around six days to a company's first detected change.
By jurisdiction
See how Perpetual KYB surfaces registry changes as they are detected.
Explore Perpetual KYBWhat stood out most was not simply the number of companies that changed, but the nature of those changes. More than 60% of recorded change events related to shares, shareholders or key individuals, which are often among the most important data points for understanding who ultimately owns, controls or influences a business.
Ownership and Control Changes Led the Early Data
276 recorded change events across 400 monitored companies in Japan, New Zealand, Taiwan and Thailand, the jurisdictions where detailed change categorisation was available in the initial sample.
Recorded change events by type
Share of 276 events (count in brackets)
of recorded changes related to shares, shareholders or individuals with major control, rather than routine filing updates.
Regulators across Asia-Pacific expect due diligence to continue for the life of a relationship, not stop at onboarding. FATF standards call for beneficial ownership information that is adequate, accurate and up to date, and supervisors including MAS and the HKMA expect firms to keep customer information current. The Index shows how hard that is to evidence on a review calendar alone.
The Gap Between a Change and the Next Review
In the early data, the average first change surfaced around six days into monitoring. Choose a review cycle to see how long a change at that point could sit unseen before the next scheduled check.
Illustration only. It applies the sample's ~6 day average time to first change to a fixed review schedule that starts on the day of the last check. It is not a prediction for any portfolio. Interpretation and review frequency remain each organisation's decision.
From Sneak Peek to Full Study
This page shares early findings from an initial sample. We are now running the full study across 8,000 companies, using the same continuous monitoring approach. Full study data will be available once the study is finished, and this page will be updated with the final figures.
Initial sample Complete
620 companies across seven APAC jurisdictions, monitored from 10 June to 10 August 2026. The early findings on this page come from this sample.
Full study Under way
8,000 companies monitored continuously against live registry data. Results are not yet available.
Full findings published
Final figures released once the full study is complete. Early findings may be revised.
Sneak peek vs full study
| Sneak peek (this page) | Full study | |
|---|---|---|
| Companies | 620 | 8,000 |
| Status | Complete, preliminary | Under way |
| Monitoring window | 10 Jun to 10 Aug 2026 | Published with results |
| How to read it | Directional only | Final figures |
| Data | Shown on this page | Available after the study is finished |
Voices in This Sneak Peek
AsiaVerify leaders comment on the early findings. Select a person to jump to their commentary.
How the Early Findings Were Produced
Initial sample
- 620 companies across seven jurisdictions: Australia (20), and China, Hong Kong, Japan, New Zealand, Taiwan and Thailand (100 each).
- Companies were drawn from those previously verified through an AsiaVerify KYB Basic report, so the sample reflects companies businesses onboard rather than a random draw from each registry.
- Australia's smaller cohort means its result should be read with caution.
Observation window
- Companies were monitored continuously against live registry data from 10 June 2026 for two months, to 10 August 2026.
- Time to first change is measured in days after monitoring started.
- The full study across 8,000 companies follows the same approach. Its window and results will be published once it is complete.
Change types
- Detailed categorisation was available for Japan, New Zealand, Taiwan and Thailand: 400 companies and 276 recorded change events.
- Six named types are shown individually; 10 further types are combined as "All other types".
- China, Hong Kong and Australia are included in the change-rate and timing results but not in the change-type breakdown.
Key definitions
- Shares change: a change in shareholding structure, volume or allocation.
- Shareholder change: a change in the identity of a registered shareholder.
- Major person change: a change to an individual with major control, such as a director, legal representative or officer.
Limitations
- These are preliminary findings from an initial sample. They are directional only, and final figures from the full study may differ.
- Results describe what happened in this sample, not incidence across all APAC companies.
- Only aggregated, anonymised results are shown. No company is identified.
How to cite this sneak peek
AsiaVerify (2026). APAC Corporate Monitoring Index: Early Findings Sneak Peek. Initial sample of 620 companies across seven APAC jurisdictions, monitored 10 June to 10 August 2026. Preliminary data; full study under way.
Close the Gap Before It Costs You
Perpetual KYB monitors live registry data continuously and sends a categorised callback when a change is detected, so your team can act on the changes that matter. The full study is on its way. In the meantime, see how Perpetual KYB would work across your own counterparties.
- Continuous monitoring of live registry data
- A categorised callback when a change is detected
- Set up once, runs for the life of your subscription
- Delivered by API into your existing systems